Monarch Casino & Resort vs Target Hospitality
MCRI and TH side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MCRI and TH compare
Monarch Casino & Resort is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Target Hospitality ($2.0B against $1.2B).
Target Hospitality grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.9% versus 4.8% for Monarch Casino & Resort).
Monarch Casino & Resort keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.4% compared with −12.2% at Target Hospitality.
Monarch Casino & Resort pays a dividend yielding 1.1%; Target Hospitality does not pay one.
Monarch Casino & Resort scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 5 for Target Hospitality), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MCRI | TH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.0B | $1.2B |
| Share price | $111.94 | $11.80 |
| Change, 1 year | 18.3% | 76.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 57.2% | 199% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.86 | 0.31 |
| Employees | 2,740 | 902 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.7× | – |
| P/S | 3.5× | 3.1× (better) |
| P/B | 3.5× (better) | 3.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.6× (better) | 27.9× |
| P/FCF | 13.8× | – |
| PEG | 2.65 | – |
| FCF yield | 7.2% | – |
| Fair value | $113.97 | $14.46 |
| Margin of safety | 1.8% | 18.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.8% | 19.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 24.2% (better) | 7.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 39.2% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 43.4% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 34.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.5% (better) | 15.7% |
| Operating margin | – | −9.5% |
| Net margin | 20.4% (better) | −12.2% |
| FCF margin | 25.2% | – |
| Return on equity | 20.4% (better) | −12.5% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −6.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.69 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 4.52 |
| Current ratio | 1.17 (better) | 0.45 |
| Altman Z-score | 9.20 (better) | 1.73 |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.1% | – |
| Payout ratio | 18.6% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 4.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.0% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 66.0% | 50.9% |
| Held by insiders | 24.5% | 20.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.6M (better) | −$201M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.2% | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- MCRI stock overview
- MCRI income statement
- MCRI valuation and score
- TH stock overview
- TH income statement
- TH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.