MasterCraft Boat vs Twin Vee PowerCats
MCFT and VEEE side by side, both in transportation equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MCFT and VEEE compare
MasterCraft Boat is the larger company, worth 130 times as much as Twin Vee PowerCats ($517M against $4.0M).
MasterCraft Boat grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (50.8% versus −5.8% for Twin Vee PowerCats).
MasterCraft Boat keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.6% compared with −82.2% at Twin Vee PowerCats.
MasterCraft Boat scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 8 for Twin Vee PowerCats), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MCFT | VEEE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $517M | $4.0M |
| Share price | $21.26 | $6.95 |
| Change, 1 year | 9.6% | −90.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −25.4% | −99.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.98 | 0.45 |
| Employees | 1,400 | 70 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 85.0× | – |
| P/S | 1.2× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 1.3× | 0.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.0× | – |
| P/FCF | 14.7× | – |
| FCF yield | 6.8% (better) | −188% |
| Fair value | $7.12 | $18.37 |
| Margin of safety | −198% | 62.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 50.8% (better) | −5.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −5.6% | 6.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −57.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −74.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 22.3% (better) | −2.0% |
| Operating margin | 1.6% (better) | −84.7% |
| Net margin | 1.6% (better) | −82.2% |
| FCF margin | 8.1% (better) | −58.1% |
| Return on equity | 2.4% (better) | −77.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 2.3% (better) | −74.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 28.6× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.62 (better) | 1.50 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.04 (better) | −3.98 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.93% (better) | −145% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.93% (better) | −145% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 73.3% | 2.2% |
| Held by insiders | 56.8% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $729K (better) | −$772K |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.9% | – |
Go deeper
- MCFT stock overview
- MCFT income statement
- MCFT valuation and score
- VEEE stock overview
- VEEE income statement
- VEEE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.