McDonalds vs Restaurant Brands International
MCD and QSR side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MCD and QSR compare
Restaurant Brands International is the larger company, worth 178575 times as much as McDonalds ($32.9B against $184K).
McDonalds grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.3% versus 5.5% for Restaurant Brands International).
Both pay dividends: McDonalds yields 2.9% and Restaurant Brands International 3.5%.
McDonalds scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 9 for Restaurant Brands International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MCD | QSR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $184K | $32.9B |
| Share price | $258.12 | $72.41 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.6% | 9.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 1.3% | 21.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.48 | 0.46 |
| Employees | 150K | 54K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 17.2× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 3.4× |
| P/B | – | 8.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.9× (better) | 15.9× |
| P/FCF | 0.0× (better) | 20.8× |
| FCF yield | 4211120% (better) | 4.8% |
| Fair value | $158484000.00 | $77.90 |
| Margin of safety | 100.0% (better) | 7.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.3% (better) | 5.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.0% | 13.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.7% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 62.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 13.6% (better) | 8.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 46.2% (better) | 27.0% |
| Net margin | 31.7% | – |
| FCF margin | 28.0% (better) | 16.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 27.1% (better) | 16.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 3.36 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.94 (better) | 4.17 |
| Interest coverage | 7.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.08 (better) | 0.96 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.86 (better) | 1.87 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.9% | 3.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 59.5% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 13 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 7.3% (better) | 3.6% |
| Buyback yield | 1262090% (better) | 1.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 1262090% (better) | 4.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 74.6% | 70.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.03% | 27.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$40.5M (better) | −$55.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.0% | 5.6% |
Go deeper
- MCD stock overview
- MCD income statement
- MCD valuation and score
- QSR stock overview
- QSR income statement
- QSR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.