Malibu Boats vs MasterCraft Boat
MBUU and MCFT side by side, both in transportation equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MBUU and MCFT compare
MasterCraft Boat is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Malibu Boats ($517M against $403M).
On earnings, Malibu Boats is cheaper: it trades at 51.3× trailing earnings, against 85.0× for MasterCraft Boat.
MasterCraft Boat grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (50.8% versus 17.1% for Malibu Boats).
MasterCraft Boat keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.6% compared with 0.86% at Malibu Boats.
MasterCraft Boat scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for Malibu Boats), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MBUU | MCFT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $403M | $517M |
| Share price | $20.50 | $21.26 |
| Change, 1 year | −20.5% | 9.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −71.0% | −25.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.96 | 0.98 |
| Employees | 3,000 | 1,400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 51.3× (better) | 85.0× |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 1.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 31.6× | 20.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 350× | 14.7× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.29% | 6.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $8.98 | $7.12 |
| Margin of safety | −128% (better) | −198% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.1% | 50.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.26% (better) | −5.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −56.6% (better) | −57.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −59.2% (better) | −74.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −55.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 16.1% | 22.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.8% (better) | 1.6% |
| Net margin | 0.86% | 1.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.12% | 8.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 1.6% | 2.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 2.3% | 2.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.33 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.75 | – |
| Interest coverage | 3.3× | 28.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.52 | 1.62 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.36 | 4.04 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 0.93% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.93% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.5% | 73.3% |
| Held by insiders | 2.6% | 56.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $729K |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.9% | 11.9% |
Go deeper
- MBUU stock overview
- MBUU income statement
- MBUU valuation and score
- MCFT stock overview
- MCFT income statement
- MCFT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.