StockData

Mobileye Global vs NICE

MBLY and NICE side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MBLY and NICE compare

NICE grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.7% versus 3.4% for Mobileye Global).

NICE keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.8% compared with −201% at Mobileye Global.

NICE scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 9 for Mobileye Global), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMBLYNICE
Size and price
Market cap$1.5B–
Share price$5.78$94.23
Change, 1 year−55.2%−26.4%
Change, 5 years–−67.7%
Beta (5Y)1.641.22
Employees4,2004,000
StockData Score
Total score913 (better)
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score05 (better)
Health score55
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.7×–
P/B0.2×–
P/FCF4.6×–
FCF yield21.7%–
Fair value$33.44–
Margin of safety82.7%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)3.4%7.7% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average14.4% (better)12.3%
Net income growth (TTM)–39.3%
EPS growth (TTM)–43.0%
EPS growth, 5Y average–26.5%
Profitability
Gross margin48.6%66.4% (better)
Operating margin−207%21.9% (better)
Net margin−201%20.8% (better)
FCF margin15.8%23.7% (better)
Return on equity−40.0%16.4% (better)
Return on invested capital−41.0%19.1% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Net debt / EBITDA–−0.49
Current ratio4.44 (better)1.55
Altman Z-score−0.91–
Piotroski F-score67 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions73.9%58.1%
Held by insiders–0.40%
Insider net buying, 12 months$199K (better)−$50.0K

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.