MBIA vs Octave Specialty
MBI and OSG side by side, both in insurance carriers. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MBI and OSG compare
MBIA and Octave Specialty are about the same size, with market caps of $239M and $241M.
Octave Specialty grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (36.0% versus 18.0% for MBIA).
Octave Specialty scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 2 for MBIA), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MBI | OSG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $239M | $241M |
| Share price | $4.68 | $5.34 |
| Change, 1 year | −37.8% | −46.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −64.7% | −67.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.14 | 0.71 |
| Employees | 57 | 275 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 2.3× | 0.7× (better) |
| P/B | – | 0.4× |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 18.0% | 36.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −22.3% | 10.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | – | −17.7% |
| Return on equity | – | −7.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | −1.35 | 0.46 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.42% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.42% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 54.3% | 66.7% |
| Held by insiders | 11.4% | 6.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $91.1K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.0% | 3.6% |
Go deeper
- MBI stock overview
- MBI income statement
- MBI valuation and score
- OSG stock overview
- OSG income statement
- OSG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.