Matthews International vs Gibraltar Industries
MATW and ROCK side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MATW and ROCK compare
Gibraltar Industries is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Matthews International ($901M against $587M).
Gibraltar Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (46.9% versus −31.8% for Matthews International).
Matthews International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.6% compared with −3.1% at Gibraltar Industries.
Matthews International pays a dividend yielding 5.4%; Gibraltar Industries does not pay one.
Matthews International scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for Gibraltar Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MATW | ROCK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $587M | $901M |
| Share price | $18.80 | $30.35 |
| Change, 1 year | −20.7% | −50.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −48.1% | −59.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | 1.17 |
| Employees | 5,500 | 2,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 0.6× |
| P/B | – | 1.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.2× (better) | 11.6× |
| FCF yield | −14.0% | −2.8% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $42.34 |
| Margin of safety | – | 28.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −31.8% | 46.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.01% | 1.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −1286% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −2188% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 36.6% (better) | 24.2% |
| Operating margin | 6.3% | 7.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −2.6% (better) | −3.1% |
| FCF margin | −7.4% | −1.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | −5.7% | −5.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 2.9% | 5.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.37 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.38 (better) | 6.62 |
| Interest coverage | 1.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.76 (better) | 1.75 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.90 (better) | 1.58 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.4% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.0% (better) | 0.50% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.4% (better) | 0.50% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.3% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 10.2% | 1.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $318K | $1.6M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 18.2% | 6.6% |
Go deeper
- MATW stock overview
- MATW income statement
- MATW valuation and score
- ROCK stock overview
- ROCK income statement
- ROCK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.