Mattel vs YETI
MAT and YETI side by side, both in dolls, toys, games and sporting and athletic. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MAT and YETI compare
Mattel is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as YETI ($4.6B against $3.1B).
On earnings, Mattel is cheaper: it trades at 9.4× trailing earnings, against 17.7× for YETI.
YETI grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.9% versus 6.4% for Mattel).
YETI keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.4% compared with 9.0% at Mattel.
YETI scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 15 for Mattel), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MAT | YETI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.6B | $3.1B |
| Share price | $16.08 | $42.79 |
| Change, 1 year | −16.1% | 17.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −29.0% | −58.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.95 | 1.46 |
| Employees | 31K | 1,390 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 | 5 |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.4× (better) | 17.7× |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 1.6× |
| P/B | 2.0× (better) | 4.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.0× (better) | 10.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 13.4× |
| PEG | 2.31 | 0.70 (better) |
| FCF yield | – | 7.5% |
| Fair value | $23.45 | $41.82 |
| Margin of safety | 31.4% (better) | −2.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.4% | 6.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.1% | 11.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 16.3% (better) | 14.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 27.6% (better) | 26.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 28.8% (better) | 2.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 49.1% | 59.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 9.5% | 12.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 9.0% | 9.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 11.9% |
| Return on equity | 21.8% | 27.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 11.2% | 29.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.00 | 0.11 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.52 (better) | −0.01 |
| Interest coverage | 4.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.98 (better) | 1.77 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.81 | 6.28 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 10.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 10.8% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 107% | 117% |
| Held by insiders | 18.8% | 1.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $422K (better) | −$442K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.0% | 11.3% |
Go deeper
- MAT stock overview
- MAT income statement
- MAT valuation and score
- YETI stock overview
- YETI income statement
- YETI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.