StockData

3 E Network Technology vs Mega Fortune

MASK and MGRT side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MASK and MGRT compare

Mega Fortune grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (233% versus 48.5% for 3 E Network Technology).

Mega Fortune keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.1% compared with −2.7% at 3 E Network Technology.

Mega Fortune scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 4 for 3 E Network Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMASKMGRT
Size and price
Share price$1.80$118.00
Change, 1 year−86.3%1822%
Beta (5Y)−1.46–
Employees1717
StockData Score
Total score46 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score13 (better)
Health score12 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)48.5%233% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−126%345% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)–325%
Profitability
Gross margin47.0%50.7% (better)
Operating margin3.6%20.3% (better)
Net margin−2.7%16.1% (better)
FCF margin−43.8%–
Return on equity−2.1%21.1% (better)
Return on invested capital1.5%22.0% (better)
Financial health
Interest coverage1.1×112× (better)
Current ratio4.234.88 (better)
Piotroski F-score25 (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions–0.18%
Held by insiders–85.3%
Short interest, % of float–1.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.