StockData

3 E Network Technology vs mF International

MASK and MFI side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MASK and MFI compare

3 E Network Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (48.5% versus 29.7% for mF International).

mF International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 233% compared with −2.7% at 3 E Network Technology.

mF International scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for 3 E Network Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMASKMFI
Size and price
Share price$1.80$7.58
Change, 1 year−86.3%−69.0%
Change, 5 years–−89.5%
Beta (5Y)−1.463.00
Employees1710
StockData Score
Total score47 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score13 (better)
Health score13 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)48.5% (better)29.7%
Net income growth (TTM)−126%–
Profitability
Gross margin47.0% (better)29.6%
Operating margin3.6% (better)−144%
Net margin−2.7%233% (better)
FCF margin−43.8% (better)−47.4%
Return on equity−2.1%8.3% (better)
Return on invested capital1.5% (better)−6.4%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage1.1×–
Current ratio4.23254.01 (better)
Piotroski F-score24 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio–0.00%
Ownership
Held by insiders–18.4%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.