MARA vs Perella Weinberg Partners
MARA and PWP side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MARA and PWP compare
MARA is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as Perella Weinberg Partners ($3.0B against $1.4B).
Perella Weinberg Partners grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.5% versus −22.1% for MARA).
Perella Weinberg Partners pays a dividend yielding 2.0%; MARA does not pay one.
Perella Weinberg Partners scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 4 for MARA), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MARA | PWP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.0B | $1.4B |
| Share price | $7.66 | $13.87 |
| Change, 1 year | −50.8% | −27.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −86.0% | 8.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 3.00 | 1.28 |
| Employees | 266 | 736 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 34.7× |
| P/S | 4.1× | 1.8× (better) |
| P/B | 1.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 17.6× |
| P/FCF | – | 13.5× |
| FCF yield | −41.2% | 7.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $10.28 | $9.38 |
| Margin of safety | 25.5% (better) | −47.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −22.1% | 2.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 191% (better) | 7.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −28.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −543% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −393% | 5.9% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 4.3% |
| FCF margin | −170% | 13.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −37.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.28 | – |
| Interest coverage | −65.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.31 | – |
| Altman Z-score | −1.48 | 2.67 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.0% |
| Payout ratio | – | 81.1% |
| Buyback yield | −0.35% | 0.15% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −0.35% | 2.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 72.5% | 80.7% |
| Held by insiders | 2.1% | 23.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.5M (better) | −$8.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 29.9% | 11.2% |
Go deeper
- MARA stock overview
- MARA income statement
- MARA valuation and score
- PWP stock overview
- PWP income statement
- PWP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.