Manchester United vs TKO
MANU and TKO side by side, both in amusement and recreation services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MANU and TKO compare
TKO grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.1% versus 1.7% for Manchester United).
TKO pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; Manchester United does not pay one.
TKO scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 1 for Manchester United), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MANU | TKO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $34.2B |
| Share price | $21.06 | $180.68 |
| Change, 1 year | 21.7% | −3.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 28.9% | 208% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.72 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 150 | 4,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 63.4× |
| P/S | – | 6.5× |
| P/B | – | 10.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 25.1× |
| Fair value | – | $96.54 |
| Margin of safety | – | −87.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.7% | 5.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.5% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 8.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 17.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 3.3% | 18.8% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 4.3% |
| FCF margin | 13.7% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 6.0% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 12.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.36 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 27.47 | 2.65 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 0.3× | 4.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.33 | 1.28 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.06 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 105% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 1.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 17.3% | 38.8% |
| Held by insiders | 61.0% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$61.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
Go deeper
- MANU stock overview
- MANU income statement
- MANU valuation and score
- TKO stock overview
- TKO income statement
- TKO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.