ManpowerGroup vs Robert Half
MAN and RHI side by side, both in personnel supply services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MAN and RHI compare
Robert Half is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as ManpowerGroup ($4.3B against $2.1B).
ManpowerGroup grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.3% versus −2.9% for Robert Half).
Both pay dividends: ManpowerGroup yields 3.1% and Robert Half 5.6%.
Robert Half scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 8 for ManpowerGroup), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MAN | RHI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.1B | $4.3B |
| Share price | $46.05 | $41.97 |
| Change, 1 year | 56.4% | 51.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −53.6% | −64.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.88 | 0.94 |
| Employees | 25K | 7,100 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 34.7× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 3.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.8× (better) | 55.3× |
| P/FCF | 289× | 20.5× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.35% | 4.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $53.53 | $24.44 |
| Margin of safety | 14.0% (better) | −71.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.3% (better) | −2.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.05% | 1.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −21.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −21.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −13.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 16.1% | 37.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.6% (better) | 1.4% |
| Net margin | – | 2.3% |
| FCF margin | 0.04% | 3.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 9.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 5.1% (better) | 5.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.52 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.26 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.05 | 1.48 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.30 | 3.80 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.1% | 5.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 196% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −8.6% | 11.7% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.01% | 0.16% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.1% | 5.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 119% | 124% |
| Held by insiders | 1.9% | 3.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $0 |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.1% | 19.3% |
Go deeper
- MAN stock overview
- MAN income statement
- MAN valuation and score
- RHI stock overview
- RHI income statement
- RHI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.