Magnitude International vs WF International
MAGH and WXM side by side, both in construction special trade contractors. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MAGH and WXM compare
Magnitude International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.0% versus −13.7% for WF International).
Magnitude International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −12.2% compared with −24.5% at WF International.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MAGH | WXM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $6.76 | $2.73 |
| Change, 1 year | 393% | −59.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | −0.50 | 2.09 |
| Employees | 107 | 28 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.0% (better) | −13.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −5528% | −442% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −7100% | −394% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 10.5% (better) | 8.8% |
| Operating margin | −11.6% (better) | −21.4% |
| Net margin | −12.2% (better) | −24.5% |
| FCF margin | −10.2% | – |
| Return on equity | −83.9% | −66.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −43.6% (better) | −93.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.41 | 0.11 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −15.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.81 (better) | 1.31 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | – |
Go deeper
- MAGH stock overview
- MAGH income statement
- MAGH valuation and score
- WXM stock overview
- WXM income statement
- WXM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.