Magnitude International vs Rantizo
MAGH and RNTZ side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MAGH and RNTZ compare
Magnitude International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.0% versus 16.6% for Rantizo).
Magnitude International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −12.2% compared with −22.6% at Rantizo.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MAGH | RNTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $6.76 | $4.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 248% | 31.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | −0.50 | 2.04 |
| Employees | 107 | 177 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.0% (better) | 16.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −5528% | −864% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −7100% | −900% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 10.5% | 25.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | −11.6% (better) | −19.6% |
| Net margin | −12.2% (better) | −22.6% |
| FCF margin | −10.2% (better) | −43.6% |
| Return on equity | −83.9% | −40.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −43.6% | −36.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.41 | – |
| Interest coverage | −15.5× | −5.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.81 (better) | 0.74 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 78.3% |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 0.21% |
Go deeper
- MAGH stock overview
- MAGH income statement
- MAGH valuation and score
- RNTZ stock overview
- RNTZ income statement
- RNTZ valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.