Maase vs SOS
MAAS and SOS side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MAAS and SOS compare
SOS grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−33.3% versus −76.5% for Maase).
SOS keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −63.1% compared with −102% at Maase.
SOS scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 3 for Maase), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MAAS | SOS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $9.98 | $0.206 |
| Change, 1 year | 169% | −86.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −97.2% | −100.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.37 | 1.33 |
| Employees | 100 | 51 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −76.5% | −33.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.83% | 25.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 13.7% (better) | 1.5% |
| Operating margin | −12.9% (better) | −63.9% |
| Net margin | −102% | −63.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | −58.2% (better) | −160% |
| Return on equity | −7.1% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −0.71% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.01 | – |
| Interest coverage | −16.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 10.67 (better) | 9.72 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.07% | – |
| Held by insiders | 81.0% | 18.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$63.3K |
Go deeper
- MAAS stock overview
- MAAS income statement
- MAAS valuation and score
- SOS stock overview
- SOS income statement
- SOS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.