StockData

LZ Technology vs RideNow

LZMH and RDNW side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How LZMH and RDNW compare

LZ Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (37.2% versus −1.3% for RideNow).

RideNow keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −0.76% compared with −15.4% at LZ Technology.

RideNow scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 3 for LZ Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricLZMHRDNW
Size and price
Market cap–$199M
Share price$0.811$5.10
Change, 1 year−98.8%48.3%
Change, 5 years–−88.4%
Beta (5Y)−1.661.81
Employees–1,906
StockData Score
Total score36 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score03 (better)
Health score11
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–0.2×
EV/EBITDA–7.5×
FCF yield–−10.4%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)37.2% (better)−1.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–21.1%
Net income growth (TTM)−3230%–
EPS growth (TTM)−2925%–
Profitability
Gross margin3.3%27.7% (better)
Operating margin−15.6%3.7% (better)
Net margin−15.4%−0.76% (better)
FCF margin−3.7%−1.9% (better)
Return on equity−305%–
Return on invested capital−158%19.5% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity1.17–
Net debt / EBITDA–3.40
Current ratio1.121.14 (better)
Altman Z-score–0.56
Piotroski F-score35 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions–52.3%
Held by insiders79.8%66.0%
Short interest, % of float–9.6%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.