La-Z-Boy vs Somnigroup International
LZB and SGI side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LZB and SGI compare
Somnigroup International is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as La-Z-Boy ($13.4B against $1.2B).
On earnings, La-Z-Boy is cheaper: it trades at 15.4× trailing earnings, against 25.4× for Somnigroup International.
Somnigroup International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.1% versus 0.20% for La-Z-Boy).
Somnigroup International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.0% compared with 3.9% at La-Z-Boy.
Both pay dividends: La-Z-Boy yields 3.2% and Somnigroup International 1.0%.
La-Z-Boy scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 12 for Somnigroup International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LZB | SGI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.2B | $13.4B |
| Share price | $30.44 | $63.56 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.8% | −22.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −15.8% | 41.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.92 | 1.22 |
| Employees | 10K | 19K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.4× (better) | 25.4× |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 1.8× |
| P/B | 1.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.3× (better) | 14.1× |
| P/FCF | 11.9× (better) | 17.4× |
| FCF yield | 8.4% (better) | 5.8% |
| Fair value | $33.14 | $45.44 |
| Margin of safety | 8.1% (better) | −39.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.20% | 27.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.2% | 15.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −11.0% | 99.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −9.2% | 74.8% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 1.4% | 2.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 44.4% (better) | 44.2% |
| Operating margin | 5.0% | 12.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 3.9% | 7.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 4.8% | 10.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 8.0% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 10.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.43 |
| Interest coverage | 169× (better) | 3.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.66 (better) | 0.75 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.57 (better) | 1.84 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.2% (better) | 1.0% |
| Payout ratio | 47.4% | 25.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 16.2% | – |
| Buyback yield | 4.9% (better) | 0.19% |
| Shareholder yield | 8.1% (better) | 1.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 102% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 2.3% | 3.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.0M | $4.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.8% | 9.3% |
Go deeper
- LZB stock overview
- LZB income statement
- LZB valuation and score
- SGI stock overview
- SGI income statement
- SGI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.