LSI Industries vs Shoals Technologies
LYTS and SHLS side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LYTS and SHLS compare
Shoals Technologies is the larger company, worth 2.4 times as much as LSI Industries ($1.4B against $576M).
On earnings, LSI Industries is cheaper: it trades at 24.5× trailing earnings, against 36.0× for Shoals Technologies.
Shoals Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (49.2% versus 27.9% for LSI Industries).
Shoals Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.8% compared with 3.0% at LSI Industries.
LSI Industries pays a dividend yielding 1.3%; Shoals Technologies does not pay one.
LSI Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 12 for Shoals Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LYTS | SHLS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $576M | $1.4B |
| Share price | $15.46 | $8.29 |
| Change, 1 year | −19.1% | −7.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 104% | −74.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.65 | 1.11 |
| Employees | 3,000 | 1,480 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 24.5× (better) | 36.0× |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 2.2× |
| P/B | – | 2.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.1× (better) | 16.2× |
| P/FCF | 10.9× | – |
| FCF yield | 9.2% (better) | −2.5% |
| Fair value | $16.86 | $9.59 |
| Margin of safety | 8.3% | 13.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 27.9% | 49.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.9% | 22.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −10.1% | 13.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −21.3% | 15.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 26.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 24.4% | 30.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 5.5% | 11.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 3.0% | 5.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.0% (better) | −5.3% |
| Return on equity | – | 6.2% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 8.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.70 | – |
| Interest coverage | 4.6× | 5.7× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.00 | 2.45 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.24 | 3.84 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | – |
| Payout ratio | 30.7% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.3% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.1% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 2.6% | 2.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.4M | −$618K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.6% | 9.5% |
Go deeper
- LYTS stock overview
- LYTS income statement
- LYTS valuation and score
- SHLS stock overview
- SHLS income statement
- SHLS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.