StockData

Lyft vs Quhuo

LYFT and QH side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How LYFT and QH compare

Lyft grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.1% versus −17.1% for Quhuo).

Lyft keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 40.7% compared with −5.9% at Quhuo.

Lyft scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 2 for Quhuo), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricLYFTQH
Size and price
Market cap$6.4B–
Share price$16.98$3.04
Change, 1 year−30.9%148%
Change, 5 years−64.3%−100.0%
Beta (5Y)1.653.70
Employees3,913474
StockData Score
Total score11 (better)2
Valuation score2 (better)0
Growth score3 (better)0
Performance score3 (better)0
Health score3 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E2.5×–
P/S0.9×–
P/B2.2×–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)10.1% (better)−17.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average21.7% (better)−0.43%
Net income growth (TTM)1765% (better)−5625%
EPS growth (TTM)1806% (better)−1200%
Profitability
Gross margin47.4% (better)0.49%
Operating margin−2.3% (better)−7.0%
Net margin40.7% (better)−5.9%
FCF margin–−1.6%
Return on equity158% (better)−36.5%
Return on invested capital−14.5% (better)−29.7%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.350.32 (better)
Interest coverage−6.8× (better)−42.4×
Current ratio0.601.03 (better)
Altman Z-score−0.06–
Piotroski F-score3 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield8.6%–
Shareholder yield8.6%–
Ownership
Held by institutions111%–
Held by insiders6.6%10.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$7.2M–
Short interest, % of float22.8%–

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.