LyondellBasell Industries vs Westlake
LYB and WLK side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LYB and WLK compare
LyondellBasell Industries is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Westlake ($22.2B against $8.7B).
LyondellBasell Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.5% versus −4.0% for Westlake).
Both pay dividends: LyondellBasell Industries yields 5.0% and Westlake 3.1%.
LyondellBasell Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 9 for Westlake), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LYB | WLK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $22.2B | $8.7B |
| Share price | $68.64 | $68.28 |
| Change, 1 year | 46.9% | −7.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −26.2% | −31.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.63 | 0.93 |
| Employees | 19K | 15K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | 2.0× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.9× | – |
| P/FCF | 9.2× | – |
| FCF yield | 10.9% (better) | −3.0% |
| Fair value | $109.89 | $112.33 |
| Margin of safety | 37.5% | 39.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.5% (better) | −4.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.7% | 8.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 14.3% (better) | 9.6% |
| Operating margin | 8.6% (better) | −11.0% |
| Net margin | – | −10.9% |
| FCF margin | 7.6% (better) | −2.3% |
| Return on equity | – | −13.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 11.1% (better) | −8.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.10 | 0.58 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.67 | – |
| Interest coverage | 5.1× (better) | −6.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.78 | 2.45 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.24 (better) | 1.71 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.0% (better) | 3.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 12 | 12 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.3% | 14.7% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 0.72% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 5.0% (better) | 3.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 75.0% | 31.1% |
| Held by insiders | 20.6% | 73.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$26.8M | −$10.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.9% | 14.6% |
Go deeper
- LYB stock overview
- LYB income statement
- LYB valuation and score
- WLK stock overview
- WLK income statement
- WLK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.