Southwest Airlines vs Pacific Airport
LUV and PAC side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LUV and PAC compare
Pacific Airport grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (23.2% versus 9.5% for Southwest Airlines).
Pacific Airport keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 23.1% compared with 2.8% at Southwest Airlines.
Southwest Airlines pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; Pacific Airport does not pay one.
Southwest Airlines scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Pacific Airport), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LUV | PAC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $20.8B | – |
| Share price | $42.43 | $230.59 |
| Change, 1 year | 38.4% | 7.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −18.8% | 68.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.02 | 0.86 |
| Employees | 73K | 23K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 26.9× | – |
| P/S | 0.7× | – |
| P/B | 2.9× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.8× | – |
| FCF yield | −2.2% | – |
| Fair value | $43.40 | – |
| Margin of safety | 2.2% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.5% | 23.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 25.4% | 28.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 114% (better) | 11.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 143% (better) | 11.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −65.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 3.5% | 42.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.8% | 23.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | −1.5% | – |
| Return on equity | 11.1% | 42.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 9.3% | 47.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.84 | 0.62 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.83 | 0.16 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 5.2× (better) | 3.9× |
| Current ratio | 0.49 | 0.91 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.16 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.7% | – |
| Payout ratio | 44.2% | 89.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 32.0% | – |
| Buyback yield | 7.5% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 9.2% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.9% | 1.7% |
| Held by insiders | 6.1% | 34.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$307K | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.3% | – |
Go deeper
- LUV stock overview
- LUV income statement
- LUV valuation and score
- PAC stock overview
- PAC income statement
- PAC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.