Intuitive Machines vs MIND Technology
LUNR and MIND side by side, both in measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LUNR and MIND compare
Intuitive Machines is the larger company, worth 97 times as much as MIND Technology ($2.8B against $28.6M).
Intuitive Machines grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (117% versus −28.5% for MIND Technology).
MIND Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −6.8% compared with −26.6% at Intuitive Machines.
MIND Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 3 for Intuitive Machines), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LUNR | MIND |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.8B | $28.6M |
| Share price | $12.18 | $3.15 |
| Change, 1 year | 23.4% | −77.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 26.1% | −78.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.67 | 0.87 |
| Employees | 525 | 157 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 5.7× | 0.8× (better) |
| P/B | – | 0.7× |
| FCF yield | −6.7% (better) | −13.5% |
| Fair value | – | $8.02 |
| Margin of safety | – | 60.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 117% (better) | −28.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 14.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −155% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −108% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 42.2% |
| Operating margin | −27.5% | −2.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −26.6% | −6.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −38.3% | −11.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | −6.8% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −3.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −10.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.66 | 6.92 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.71 (better) | 1.03 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 62.5% | 14.3% |
| Held by insiders | 43.2% | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$264M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 27.8% | 2.6% |
Go deeper
- LUNR stock overview
- LUNR income statement
- LUNR valuation and score
- MIND stock overview
- MIND income statement
- MIND valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.