LTC Properties vs Safehold
LTC and SAFE side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LTC and SAFE compare
LTC Properties is the larger company, worth 3.0 times as much as Safehold ($2.4B against $800M).
On earnings, Safehold is cheaper: it trades at 7.0× trailing earnings, against 16.4× for LTC Properties.
LTC Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (59.8% versus 12.1% for Safehold).
LTC Properties keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 38.9% compared with 27.7% at Safehold.
Both pay dividends: LTC Properties yields 4.7% and Safehold 6.3%.
Safehold scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 19 for LTC Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LTC | SAFE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.4B | $800M |
| Share price | $44.75 | $11.30 |
| Change, 1 year | 29.2% | −22.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 32.3% | −91.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.42 | 1.00 |
| Employees | 25 | 72 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 5 | 5 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.4× | 7.0× (better) |
| P/S | 6.9× | 1.9× (better) |
| P/B | 1.9× | 0.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.3× | 8.6× (better) |
| PEG | 30.65 | – |
| Fair value | $46.81 | $25.51 |
| Margin of safety | 4.4% | 55.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 59.8% (better) | 12.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.5% (better) | 3.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 62.7% (better) | 13.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 50.0% (better) | 13.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 0.81% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 98.9% |
| Operating margin | 62.6% (better) | 25.1% |
| Net margin | 38.9% (better) | 27.7% |
| Return on equity | 12.2% (better) | 4.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 19.8% (better) | 4.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.22 (better) | 0.24 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.7% | 6.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 83.3% | 44.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | 10.5% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −11.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −7.1% | 6.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 79.7% | 68.7% |
| Held by insiders | 2.2% | 4.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.3M (better) | −$138K |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.2% | 4.8% |
Go deeper
- LTC stock overview
- LTC income statement
- LTC valuation and score
- SAFE stock overview
- SAFE income statement
- SAFE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.