StockData

Liquidia vs Pharming

LQDA and PHAR side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How LQDA and PHAR compare

Liquidia grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (798% versus 26.6% for Pharming).

Pharming keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.76% compared with −15.1% at Liquidia.

Liquidia scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 8 for Pharming), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricLQDAPHAR
Size and price
Market cap$5.1B–
Share price$57.41$12.60
Change, 1 year103%−26.5%
Change, 5 years1248%46.2%
Beta (5Y)0.970.55
Employees21650K
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)8
Valuation score00
Growth score22
Performance score2 (better)1
Health score6 (better)5
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S8.3×–
P/FCF17.6×–
FCF yield5.7%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)798% (better)26.6%
Revenue growth, 5Y average192% (better)12.1%
EPS growth, 5Y average–−40.8%
Profitability
Gross margin–87.9%
Operating margin−15.6%6.9% (better)
Net margin−15.1%0.76% (better)
FCF margin46.8% (better)14.3%
Financial health
Interest coverage–132×
Current ratio1.022.59 (better)
Altman Z-score3.31–
Piotroski F-score47 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions81.1%0.32%
Held by insiders19.5%0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$227M–
Short interest, % of float24.3%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.