Louisiana-Pacific vs Champion Homes
LPX and SKY side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LPX and SKY compare
Louisiana-Pacific and Champion Homes are about the same size, with market caps of $5.3B and $5.0B.
On earnings, Champion Homes is cheaper: it trades at 27.5× trailing earnings, against 96.0× for Louisiana-Pacific.
Champion Homes grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.5% versus −14.3% for Louisiana-Pacific).
Champion Homes keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.8% compared with 2.2% at Louisiana-Pacific.
Louisiana-Pacific pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; Champion Homes does not pay one.
Champion Homes scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Louisiana-Pacific), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LPX | SKY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.3B | $5.0B |
| Share price | $75.85 | $92.33 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.6% | 14.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 8.3% | 14.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.24 | 1.27 |
| Employees | 4,300 | 700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 96.0× | 27.5× (better) |
| P/S | 2.1× | 1.8× (better) |
| P/B | 3.0× (better) | 3.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 24.0× | 15.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 21.8× |
| FCF yield | −0.40% | 4.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $34.82 | $72.38 |
| Margin of safety | −118% | −27.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −14.3% | 3.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.5% | 13.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −81.8% | −15.8% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −81.5% | −12.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −14.1% | 19.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 18.0% | 25.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.0% | 8.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.2% | 6.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.85% | 8.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 3.1% | 11.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 2.9% | 18.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.20 | 0.01 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.53 (better) | −2.52 |
| Interest coverage | 4.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.22 (better) | 2.75 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.85 | 8.09 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.6% | – |
| Payout ratio | 150% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 14.1% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 4.0% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.6% | 4.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 112% |
| Held by insiders | 1.6% | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$13.6M | −$2.6M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.6% | 4.8% |
Go deeper
- LPX stock overview
- LPX income statement
- LPX valuation and score
- SKY stock overview
- SKY income statement
- SKY valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.