El Pollo Loco vs Portillo's
LOCO and PTLO side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LOCO and PTLO compare
El Pollo Loco is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Portillo's ($466M against $370M).
On earnings, El Pollo Loco is cheaper: it trades at 13.1× trailing earnings, against 27.1× for Portillo's.
El Pollo Loco grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.4% versus 2.9% for Portillo's).
El Pollo Loco keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.0% compared with 1.9% at Portillo's.
El Pollo Loco scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 8 for Portillo's), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LOCO | PTLO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $466M | $370M |
| Share price | $15.30 | $4.87 |
| Change, 1 year | 60.9% | −9.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −1.3% | −89.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.67 | 1.19 |
| Employees | 4,034 | 7,890 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 5 | 5 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.1× (better) | 27.1× |
| P/S | 0.9× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 1.5× | 0.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.5× (better) | 11.0× |
| P/FCF | 11.4× | – |
| PEG | 0.80 (better) | 10.41 |
| FCF yield | 8.8% (better) | −2.5% |
| Fair value | $22.54 | $7.44 |
| Margin of safety | 32.1% | 34.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.4% (better) | 2.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.8% | 10.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 41.0% (better) | −54.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 39.3% (better) | −60.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 5.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 10.5% (better) | 4.5% |
| Net margin | 7.0% (better) | 1.9% |
| FCF margin | 8.2% (better) | −1.2% |
| Return on equity | 11.8% (better) | 3.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 13.1% (better) | 4.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.70 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 4.87 |
| Interest coverage | 14.9× (better) | 1.5× |
| Current ratio | 0.41 (better) | 0.26 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.06 (better) | 0.69 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −0.70% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −0.70% | 0.00% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.7% | 59.6% |
| Held by insiders | 20.3% | 47.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$9.6M | $2.1M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.6% | 26.3% |
Go deeper
- LOCO stock overview
- LOCO income statement
- LOCO valuation and score
- PTLO stock overview
- PTLO income statement
- PTLO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.