LanzaTech Global vs TOMI Environmental Solutions
LNZA and TOMZ side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LNZA and TOMZ compare
LanzaTech Global is the larger company, worth 2.4 times as much as TOMI Environmental Solutions ($50.4M against $20.7M).
LanzaTech Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (43.8% versus 11.4% for TOMI Environmental Solutions).
LanzaTech Global keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 296% compared with −49.8% at TOMI Environmental Solutions.
LanzaTech Global scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 4 for TOMI Environmental Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LNZA | TOMZ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $50.4M | $20.7M |
| Share price | $3.85 | $2.54 |
| Change, 1 year | −78.6% | 0.79% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.6% | −30.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 0.98 |
| Employees | 192 | 7 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 0.3× | – |
| P/S | 0.9× (better) | 3.0× |
| P/B | 0.2× (better) | 14.5× |
| FCF yield | −67.1% | −9.9% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $0.869 |
| Margin of safety | – | −192% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 43.8% (better) | 11.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −25.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 52.9% |
| Operating margin | −61.0% | −41.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 296% (better) | −49.8% |
| FCF margin | −58.0% | −29.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 146% (better) | −169% |
| Return on invested capital | −37.2% (better) | −140% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −8.9× |
| Current ratio | 2.48 (better) | 1.49 |
| Altman Z-score | −3.22 (better) | −8.14 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 25.4% | – |
| Held by insiders | – | 8.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $4.3M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 0.20% |
Go deeper
- LNZA stock overview
- LNZA income statement
- LNZA valuation and score
- TOMZ stock overview
- TOMZ income statement
- TOMZ valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.