StockData

LanzaTech Global vs Tantech

LNZA and TANH side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How LNZA and TANH compare

LanzaTech Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (43.8% versus −10.7% for Tantech).

LanzaTech Global keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 296% compared with −80.9% at Tantech.

LanzaTech Global scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 1 for Tantech), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricLNZATANH
Size and price
Market cap$50.4M–
Share price$3.85$40.04
Change, 1 year−78.6%−28.5%
Change, 5 years−99.6%−100.0%
Beta (5Y)0.971.42
Employees19245
StockData Score
Total score12 (better)1
Valuation score2 (better)0
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score3 (better)0
Health score5 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E0.3×–
P/S0.9×–
P/B0.2×–
FCF yield−67.1%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)43.8% (better)−10.7%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−1.9%
Profitability
Gross margin–18.6%
Operating margin−61.0%−31.8% (better)
Net margin296% (better)−80.9%
FCF margin−58.0%−15.2% (better)
Return on equity146% (better)−25.7%
Return on invested capital−37.2%−11.1% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage–−43.7×
Current ratio2.486.59 (better)
Altman Z-score−3.22–
Piotroski F-score3 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions25.4%–
Held by insiders–0.02%
Insider net buying, 12 months$4.3M–
Short interest, % of float–0.57%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.