Lantheus vs Neogen
LNTH and NEOG side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LNTH and NEOG compare
Lantheus is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Neogen ($6.6B against $2.5B).
Lantheus grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.4% versus −0.33% for Neogen).
Lantheus keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.3% compared with −6.3% at Neogen.
Lantheus scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 7 for Neogen), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LNTH | NEOG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.6B | $2.5B |
| Share price | $101.60 | $11.60 |
| Change, 1 year | 100% | 82.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 254% | −73.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.70 | 1.20 |
| Employees | 1,193 | 2,636 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.1× | – |
| P/S | 4.2× | 2.9× (better) |
| P/B | 4.9× | 1.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.1× (better) | 35.9× |
| P/FCF | – | 50.9× |
| PEG | 0.24 | – |
| FCF yield | – | 2.0% |
| Fair value | $92.33 | $7.55 |
| Margin of safety | −10.0% (better) | −53.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.4% (better) | −0.33% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 35.3% (better) | 13.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 61.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 69.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 61.3% (better) | 47.4% |
| Operating margin | 18.6% (better) | −0.83% |
| Net margin | 17.3% (better) | −6.3% |
| FCF margin | – | 5.6% |
| Return on equity | 21.8% (better) | −2.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 18.0% (better) | −0.17% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.42 (better) | 0.74 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.29 | 12.69 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 14.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.25 | 3.90 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 5.53 (better) | 1.43 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 117% | 109% |
| Held by insiders | 2.3% | 0.60% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$102K |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.7% | 5.9% |
Go deeper
- LNTH stock overview
- LNTH income statement
- LNTH valuation and score
- NEOG stock overview
- NEOG income statement
- NEOG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.