Alliant Energy vs NorthWestern Energy
LNT and NWE side by side, both in combination electric and gas, and other utility. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LNT and NWE compare
Alliant Energy is the larger company, worth 3.6 times as much as NorthWestern Energy ($19.0B against $5.2B).
On earnings, Alliant Energy is cheaper: it trades at 20.5× trailing earnings, against 32.0× for NorthWestern Energy.
NorthWestern Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.1% versus 5.4% for Alliant Energy).
Alliant Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.7% compared with 9.5% at NorthWestern Energy.
Both pay dividends: Alliant Energy yields 2.9% and NorthWestern Energy 3.1%.
Alliant Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 3 for NorthWestern Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LNT | NWE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $19.0B | $5.2B |
| Share price | $73.43 | $84.91 |
| Change, 1 year | 7.8% | 26.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 29.3% | 55.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.34 | 0.35 |
| Employees | 2,948 | 1,667 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.5× (better) | 32.0× |
| P/S | 4.2× | 3.0× (better) |
| P/B | 2.4× | 1.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.4× | 15.4× (better) |
| PEG | 4.28 | – |
| FCF yield | – | −3.7% |
| Fair value | $64.33 | $55.13 |
| Margin of safety | −14.2% (better) | −54.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.4% | 10.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.0% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.2% (better) | −24.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.9% (better) | −24.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 85.8% | – |
| Operating margin | 22.6% (better) | 18.1% |
| Net margin | 20.7% (better) | 9.5% |
| FCF margin | – | −11.2% |
| Return on equity | 12.4% (better) | 5.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 5.3% (better) | 4.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.56 | 1.27 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.38 | 6.34 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.51 | 0.90 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.12 (better) | 0.97 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.9% | 3.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 58.1% | 99.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 6.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.9% | 3.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.7% | 95.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.28% | 0.92% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.0% | 3.3% |
Go deeper
- LNT stock overview
- LNT income statement
- LNT valuation and score
- NWE stock overview
- NWE income statement
- NWE valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.