Alliant Energy vs MGE Energy
LNT and MGEE side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LNT and MGEE compare
Alliant Energy is the larger company, worth 6.4 times as much as MGE Energy ($19.0B against $3.0B).
On earnings, MGE Energy is cheaper: it trades at 19.4× trailing earnings, against 20.5× for Alliant Energy.
MGE Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.1% versus 5.4% for Alliant Energy).
Alliant Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.7% compared with 19.5% at MGE Energy.
Both pay dividends: Alliant Energy yields 2.9% and MGE Energy 2.5%.
MGE Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 12 for Alliant Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LNT | MGEE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $19.0B | $3.0B |
| Share price | $73.43 | $78.76 |
| Change, 1 year | 7.8% | −6.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 29.3% | 4.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.34 | 0.34 |
| Employees | 2,948 | 726 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.5× | 19.4× (better) |
| P/S | 4.2× | 3.9× (better) |
| P/B | 2.4× | 2.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.4× (better) | 23.0× |
| PEG | 4.28 | 2.93 (better) |
| FCF yield | – | −5.5% |
| Fair value | $64.33 | $78.37 |
| Margin of safety | −14.2% | −0.49% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.4% | 7.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.0% | 6.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.2% (better) | 14.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.9% | 13.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.9% | 7.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 85.8% | – |
| Operating margin | 22.6% (better) | 22.0% |
| Net margin | 20.7% (better) | 19.5% |
| FCF margin | – | −21.4% |
| Return on equity | 12.4% (better) | 11.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 5.3% | 6.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.56 | 0.65 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.38 | 5.42 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.51 | 1.14 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.12 | 1.37 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.9% (better) | 2.5% |
| Payout ratio | 58.1% | 46.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 6.0% (better) | 5.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | −3.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.9% (better) | −0.53% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.7% | 70.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.28% | 0.43% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7 | $92.7K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.0% | 3.9% |
Go deeper
- LNT stock overview
- LNT income statement
- LNT valuation and score
- MGEE stock overview
- MGEE income statement
- MGEE valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.