Live Ventures vs Winmark
LIVE and WINA side by side, both in miscellaneous retail. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LIVE and WINA compare
Winmark is the larger company, worth 44 times as much as Live Ventures ($967M against $22.1M).
Winmark grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.6% versus −2.2% for Live Ventures).
Winmark keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 45.1% compared with −0.59% at Live Ventures.
Winmark pays a dividend yielding 3.0%; Live Ventures does not pay one.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LIVE | WINA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $22.1M | $967M |
| Share price | $7.20 | $271.74 |
| Change, 1 year | −40.2% | −37.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −78.8% | 2.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.29 | 0.64 |
| Employees | 1,744 | 87 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 9 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 24.2× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 10.5× |
| P/B | 0.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.4× (better) | 17.7× |
| P/FCF | 1.6× (better) | 22.1× |
| PEG | – | 24.42 |
| FCF yield | 63.0% (better) | 4.5% |
| Fair value | $59.67 | $251.43 |
| Margin of safety | 87.9% (better) | −8.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −2.2% | 8.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.3% (better) | 5.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −237% | 0.36% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −0.09% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 9.8% (better) | 7.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.1% | – |
| Operating margin | 2.4% | 59.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.59% | 45.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.2% | 47.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | −2.8% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 9.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.04 |
| Interest coverage | 0.7× | 22.4× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.35 | 3.20 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.49 | 12.06 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 3.0% |
| Payout ratio | – | 120% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 3.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 7.1% | 90.3% |
| Held by insiders | – | 8.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $2.5K (better) | −$3.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 10.0% |
Go deeper
- LIVE stock overview
- LIVE income statement
- LIVE valuation and score
- WINA stock overview
- WINA income statement
- WINA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.