Live Ventures vs Suburban Propane Partners LP
LIVE and SPH side by side, both in miscellaneous retail. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LIVE and SPH compare
Suburban Propane Partners LP is the larger company, worth 53 times as much as Live Ventures ($1.2B against $22.4M).
Live Ventures grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−2.2% versus −2.5% for Suburban Propane Partners LP).
Suburban Propane Partners LP keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.4% compared with −0.59% at Live Ventures.
Suburban Propane Partners LP pays a dividend yielding 7.2%; Live Ventures does not pay one.
Suburban Propane Partners LP scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 9 for Live Ventures), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LIVE | SPH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $22.4M | $1.2B |
| Share price | $7.30 | $17.96 |
| Change, 1 year | −53.0% | −1.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −77.1% | 18.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.29 | 0.35 |
| Employees | 1,744 | 3,190 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.9× |
| P/B | 0.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.4× (better) | 8.6× |
| P/FCF | 1.6× (better) | 11.8× |
| FCF yield | 62.1% (better) | 8.5% |
| Fair value | $64.44 | $26.26 |
| Margin of safety | 88.7% (better) | 31.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −2.2% (better) | −2.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.3% (better) | 5.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −237% | 34.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 9.8% | 10.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.1% | 63.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 2.4% | 15.1% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.59% | 9.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.2% | 7.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | −2.8% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 9.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 4.36 |
| Interest coverage | 0.7× | 2.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.35 (better) | 0.78 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.50 (better) | 1.30 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 7.2% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 7.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 7.1% | 43.3% |
| Held by insiders | – | 3.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $2.5K (better) | −$264K |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 0.75% |
Go deeper
- LIVE stock overview
- LIVE income statement
- LIVE valuation and score
- SPH stock overview
- SPH income statement
- SPH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.