StockData

LiqTech International vs Schmid

LIQT and SHMD side by side, both in industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How LIQT and SHMD compare

Schmid grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.0% versus −4.6% for LiqTech International).

LiqTech International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −63.4% compared with −106% at Schmid.

LiqTech International scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 1 for Schmid), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricLIQTSHMD
Size and price
Market cap$8.7M–
Share price$0.264$2.09
Change, 1 year−87.9%−63.0%
Change, 5 years−99.4%–
Beta (5Y)0.880.39
Employees92734
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)1
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score11
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score5 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.5×–
P/B0.4×–
FCF yield−97.7%–
Fair value$1.10–
Margin of safety76.0%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−4.6%10.0% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−6.0%–
Profitability
Gross margin7.4%23.9% (better)
Operating margin−56.7%2.2% (better)
Net margin−63.4% (better)−106%
FCF margin−53.1%–
Return on equity−54.8%–
Return on invested capital−38.7%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Net debt / EBITDA–8.29
Interest coverage–0.0×
Current ratio4.32 (better)0.37
Altman Z-score−3.29–
Piotroski F-score56 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions35.4%–
Held by insiders45.8%–
Insider net buying, 12 months$800K (better)$309K
Short interest, % of float1.2%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.