StockData

AEye vs ParaZero Technologies

LIDR and PRZO side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How LIDR and PRZO compare

AEye grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (398% versus 12.3% for ParaZero Technologies).

ParaZero Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −517% compared with −4079% at AEye.

AEye scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for ParaZero Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricLIDRPRZO
Size and price
Market cap$34.6M–
Share price$0.744$0.428
Change, 1 year−70.0%−67.3%
Change, 5 years−99.5%–
Beta (5Y)1.832.13
Employees5622
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)7
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score11
Health score55
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S38.2×–
P/B0.6×–
FCF yield−92.0%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)398% (better)12.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−31.8%–
EPS growth (TTM)–−68.7%
Profitability
Gross margin−65.0%4.8% (better)
Operating margin−4358%−721% (better)
Net margin−4079%−517% (better)
FCF margin−3511%−557% (better)
Return on equity−53.5% (better)−97.9%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio7.51 (better)5.10
Altman Z-score−7.50–
Piotroski F-score6 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−34.5%–
Shareholder yield−34.5%–
Ownership
Held by institutions23.3%7.1%
Held by insiders4.1%2.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$86.9K−$14.8K (better)
Short interest, % of float5.5%5.9%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.