Li Auto vs XPeng
LI and XPEV side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LI and XPEV compare
XPeng grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (87.7% versus −22.3% for Li Auto).
XPeng scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 3 for Li Auto), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LI | XPEV |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $11.03 | $9.04 |
| Change, 1 year | −47.4% | −61.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −64.4% | −80.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.81 | 1.43 |
| Employees | 6,041 | 5,084 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −22.3% | 87.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 64.0% | 67.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −85.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 18.7% | 18.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | −0.46% (better) | −3.6% |
| Net margin | – | −1.5% |
| FCF margin | −11.4% | 6.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | −3.7% |
| Return on invested capital | −3.4% (better) | −8.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.13 (better) | 0.42 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −12.97 | – |
| Interest coverage | −3.1× (better) | −7.3× |
| Current ratio | 1.81 (better) | 1.09 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 1.9% | 6.7% |
| Held by insiders | 43.6% | 20.9% |
Go deeper
- LI stock overview
- LI income statement
- LI valuation and score
- XPEV stock overview
- XPEV income statement
- XPEV valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.