StockData

LGL vs Neonode

LGL and NEON side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How LGL and NEON compare

LGL is the larger company, worth 8.9 times as much as Neonode ($86.4M against $9.7M).

LGL grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.8% versus −2.3% for Neonode).

LGL keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −21.3% compared with −336% at Neonode.

Neonode scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for LGL), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricLGLNEON
Size and price
Market cap$86.4M$9.7M
Share price$6.85$0.580
Change, 1 year17.1%−74.4%
Change, 5 years−42.0%−94.7%
Beta (5Y)0.322.06
Employees30639
StockData Score
Total score89 (better)
Valuation score13 (better)
Growth score11
Performance score00
Health score6 (better)5
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S17.6×4.5× (better)
P/B1.0×0.5× (better)
FCF yield–−116%
Fair value–$2.40
Margin of safety–75.8%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)19.8% (better)−2.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−33.1%−19.2% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−214%−180% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)−194%–
EPS growth, 5Y average−10.4%–
Profitability
Gross margin–99.1%
Operating margin−22.1% (better)−376%
Net margin−21.3% (better)−336%
FCF margin–−525%
Return on equity−1.7% (better)−31.0%
Return on invested capital–−84.1%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio45.39 (better)13.06
Altman Z-score24.13 (better)−11.62
Piotroski F-score55
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions16.6%11.6%
Held by insiders47.7%0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months$453K–
Short interest, % of float0.31%2.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.