StockData

LGL vs MicroVision

LGL and MVIS side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How LGL and MVIS compare

LGL is the larger company, worth 2.4 times as much as MicroVision ($86.4M against $35.8M).

MicroVision grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (90.9% versus 19.8% for LGL).

LGL keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −21.3% compared with −2231% at MicroVision.

LGL scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for MicroVision), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricLGLMVIS
Size and price
Market cap$86.4M$35.8M
Share price$6.85$1.05
Change, 1 year17.1%−92.6%
Change, 5 years−42.0%−99.1%
Beta (5Y)0.321.65
Employees306350
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)6
Valuation score13 (better)
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score6 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S17.6×7.1× (better)
P/B1.0× (better)1.6×
FCF yield–−187%
Fair value–$2.20
Margin of safety–52.2%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)19.8%90.9% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−33.1%−17.1% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−214%–
EPS growth (TTM)−194%–
EPS growth, 5Y average−10.4%–
Profitability
Gross margin–−276%
Operating margin−22.1% (better)−2195%
Net margin−21.3% (better)−2231%
FCF margin–−1326%
Return on equity−1.7% (better)−198%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage–−10.9×
Current ratio45.39 (better)0.80
Altman Z-score24.13 (better)−19.67
Piotroski F-score5 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−60.0%
Shareholder yield0.00% (better)−60.0%
Ownership
Held by institutions16.6%10.5%
Held by insiders47.7%10.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months$453K–
Short interest, % of float0.31%20.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.