Centrus Energy vs United States Lime & Minerals
LEU and USLM side by side, both in mining & quarrying of nonmetallic minerals (no fuels). Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LEU and USLM compare
United States Lime & Minerals is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Centrus Energy ($3.2B against $2.1B).
On earnings, United States Lime & Minerals is cheaper: it trades at 24.0× trailing earnings, against 30.4× for Centrus Energy.
United States Lime & Minerals grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.5% versus 0.09% for Centrus Energy).
United States Lime & Minerals keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 35.1% compared with 16.8% at Centrus Energy.
United States Lime & Minerals pays a dividend yielding 0.22%; Centrus Energy does not pay one.
United States Lime & Minerals scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 6 for Centrus Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LEU | USLM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.1B | $3.2B |
| Share price | $103.78 | $111.18 |
| Change, 1 year | −62.3% | −9.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 61.7% | 314% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.46 | 0.90 |
| Employees | 1,100 | 346 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 30.4× | 24.0× (better) |
| P/S | 4.6× (better) | 8.4× |
| P/B | 1.9× (better) | 4.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | −40.3× | 15.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 32.3× |
| PEG | 6.23 | 0.56 (better) |
| FCF yield | −14.3% | 3.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $89.29 | $88.00 |
| Margin of safety | −16.2% (better) | −26.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.09% | 4.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.7% | 18.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −33.0% | 2.3% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −48.2% | 2.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 46.9% (better) | 36.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 23.3% | 47.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | −1.3% | 41.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 16.8% | 35.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | −65.0% | 25.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 10.4% | 20.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 44.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −0.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 8.61 | 22.29 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.80 | 32.83 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.22% |
| Payout ratio | – | 5.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 13.4% |
| Buyback yield | −21.1% | 0.08% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −21.1% | 0.30% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 74.9% | 32.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.84% | 62.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$62.3K (better) | −$5.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 29.3% | 9.7% |
Go deeper
- LEU stock overview
- LEU income statement
- LEU valuation and score
- USLM stock overview
- USLM income statement
- USLM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.