StockData

LENZ Therapeutics vs Ocular Therapeutix

LENZ and OCUL side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How LENZ and OCUL compare

Ocular Therapeutix is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as LENZ Therapeutics ($1.4B against $130M).

LENZ Therapeutics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (330% versus −9.7% for Ocular Therapeutix).

LENZ Therapeutics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −587% compared with −649% at Ocular Therapeutix.

LENZ Therapeutics scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 3 for Ocular Therapeutix), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricLENZOCUL
Size and price
Market cap$130M$1.4B
Share price$4.13$6.21
Change, 1 year−83.8%−46.0%
Change, 5 years−94.7%−7.2%
Beta (5Y)1.081.25
Employees152325
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)3
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score00
Health score5 (better)3
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S6.0× (better)27.1×
P/B0.6× (better)3.1×
FCF yield−88.2%−19.6% (better)
Fair value$7.62$4.70
Margin of safety45.8% (better)−32.2%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)330% (better)−9.7%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–24.4%
Profitability
Gross margin–87.3%
Operating margin−632% (better)−681%
Net margin−587% (better)−649%
FCF margin−533%−530% (better)
Return on equity−59.2% (better)−93.5%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.17 (better)
Interest coverage–−30.6×
Current ratio13.55 (better)9.12
Altman Z-score2.01 (better)0.92
Piotroski F-score44
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions110%94.4%
Held by insiders6.7%2.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$8.8M−$2.5M (better)
Short interest, % of float24.1%13.6%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.