Legacy Housing vs UMH Properties
LEGH and UMH side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LEGH and UMH compare
UMH Properties is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Legacy Housing ($1.2B against $675M).
On earnings, Legacy Housing is cheaper: it trades at 10.6× trailing earnings, against 291× for UMH Properties.
Legacy Housing grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.6% versus 8.5% for UMH Properties).
UMH Properties pays a dividend yielding 6.2%; Legacy Housing does not pay one.
Legacy Housing scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 10 for UMH Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LEGH | UMH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $675M | $1.2B |
| Share price | $28.40 | $14.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 40.5% | −4.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 7.7% | −37.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.80 | 0.61 |
| Employees | 592 | 540 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.6× (better) | 291× |
| P/S | 3.2× (better) | 4.5× |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 1.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.5× | – |
| P/FCF | 16.6× | – |
| FCF yield | 6.0% | – |
| Fair value | $42.44 | $13.80 |
| Margin of safety | 33.1% (better) | −5.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.6% (better) | 8.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −1.4% | 9.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 30.3% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 36.9% (better) | −37.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 2.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 51.1% | – |
| Operating margin | 34.8% | – |
| Net margin | 30.1% | – |
| FCF margin | 19.5% | – |
| Return on equity | 11.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 11.6% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 1067× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.25 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 9.43 (better) | 0.98 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 6.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 4.3% |
| Buyback yield | 0.26% (better) | −0.42% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.26% | 5.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 40.8% | 76.7% |
| Held by insiders | 54.4% | 10.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $118K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.9% | 5.6% |
Go deeper
- LEGH stock overview
- LEGH income statement
- LEGH valuation and score
- UMH stock overview
- UMH income statement
- UMH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.