Legacy Housing vs Champion Homes
LEGH and SKY side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LEGH and SKY compare
Champion Homes is the larger company, worth 7.4 times as much as Legacy Housing ($5.0B against $675M).
On earnings, Legacy Housing is cheaper: it trades at 10.6× trailing earnings, against 27.5× for Champion Homes.
Legacy Housing grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.6% versus 3.5% for Champion Homes).
Legacy Housing keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 30.1% compared with 6.8% at Champion Homes.
Legacy Housing scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 9 for Champion Homes), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LEGH | SKY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $675M | $5.0B |
| Share price | $28.40 | $92.33 |
| Change, 1 year | 40.5% | 14.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 7.7% | 14.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.80 | 1.27 |
| Employees | 592 | 700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.6× (better) | 27.5× |
| P/S | 3.2× | 1.8× (better) |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 3.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.5× (better) | 15.8× |
| P/FCF | 16.6× (better) | 21.8× |
| FCF yield | 6.0% (better) | 4.6% |
| Fair value | $42.44 | $72.38 |
| Margin of safety | 33.1% (better) | −27.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.6% (better) | 3.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −1.4% | 13.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 30.3% (better) | −15.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 36.9% (better) | −12.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 2.1% | 19.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 51.1% (better) | 25.5% |
| Operating margin | 34.8% (better) | 8.3% |
| Net margin | 30.1% (better) | 6.8% |
| FCF margin | 19.5% (better) | 8.5% |
| Return on equity | 11.4% | 11.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 11.6% | 18.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.01 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −2.52 |
| Interest coverage | 1067× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.25 (better) | 2.75 |
| Altman Z-score | 9.43 (better) | 8.09 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.26% | 4.0% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.26% | 4.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 40.8% | 112% |
| Held by insiders | 54.4% | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$2.6M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.9% | 4.8% |
Go deeper
- LEGH stock overview
- LEGH income statement
- LEGH valuation and score
- SKY stock overview
- SKY income statement
- SKY valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.