Lee Enterprises vs New York Times
LEE and NYT side by side, both in printing, publishing, and allied industries. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LEE and NYT compare
New York Times is the larger company, worth 83 times as much as Lee Enterprises ($11.3B against $136M).
New York Times grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.8% versus −11.1% for Lee Enterprises).
New York Times keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.2% compared with −1.8% at Lee Enterprises.
New York Times pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; Lee Enterprises does not pay one.
New York Times scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 3 for Lee Enterprises), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LEE | NYT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $136M | $11.3B |
| Share price | $6.12 | $70.17 |
| Change, 1 year | 33.9% | 25.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −70.3% | 39.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.66 | 0.54 |
| Employees | 2,500 | 6,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 29.4× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 3.8× |
| P/B | – | 5.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.2× (better) | 19.1× |
| P/FCF | – | 18.2× |
| PEG | – | 1.12 |
| FCF yield | −0.42% | 5.5% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $54.44 |
| Margin of safety | – | −28.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −11.1% | 10.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −1.9% | 9.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 22.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 23.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 28.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 51.4% |
| Operating margin | 4.0% | 16.0% (better) |
| Net margin | −1.8% | 13.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.11% | 20.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 19.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 4.2% | 26.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 11.24 | – |
| Interest coverage | 0.6× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.17 | 1.58 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.36 | 10.17 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 9 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 32.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 7 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 24.6% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 20.3% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | – | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $13.2M (better) | −$9.8M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 11.6% |
Go deeper
- LEE stock overview
- LEE income statement
- LEE valuation and score
- NYT stock overview
- NYT income statement
- NYT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.