Lee Enterprises vs News
LEE and NWSA side by side, both in printing, publishing, and allied industries. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LEE and NWSA compare
News is the larger company, worth 95 times as much as Lee Enterprises ($14.5B against $154M).
News grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.8% versus −11.1% for Lee Enterprises).
News keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.8% compared with −1.8% at Lee Enterprises.
News pays a dividend yielding 0.75%; Lee Enterprises does not pay one.
News scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 3 for Lee Enterprises), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LEE | NWSA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $154M | $14.5B |
| Share price | $6.89 | $26.83 |
| Change, 1 year | 69.1% | 0.11% |
| Change, 5 years | −62.7% | 21.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.65 | 0.87 |
| Employees | 2,500 | 22K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 24.0× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 1.6× |
| P/B | – | 1.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.7× | 9.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 20.2× |
| PEG | – | 0.41 |
| FCF yield | −0.38% | 4.9% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $27.04 |
| Margin of safety | – | 0.77% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −11.1% | 7.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −1.9% | −0.72% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −47.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −45.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 13.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 4.0% | – |
| Net margin | −1.8% | 6.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.11% | 7.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 7.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 4.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.24 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 11.24 | 0.14 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 0.6× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.17 | 1.62 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.37 | 2.10 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.75% |
| Payout ratio | – | 35.2% |
| Buyback yield | – | 4.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 5.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 20.3% | 86.2% |
| Held by insiders | – | 18.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $13.2M (better) | −$3.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
Go deeper
- LEE stock overview
- LEE income statement
- LEE valuation and score
- NWSA stock overview
- NWSA income statement
- NWSA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.