Lifetime Brands vs National Presto Industries
LCUT and NPK side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LCUT and NPK compare
National Presto Industries is the larger company, worth 5.6 times as much as Lifetime Brands ($993M against $179M).
National Presto Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.9% versus 1.2% for Lifetime Brands).
National Presto Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.0% compared with 4.3% at Lifetime Brands.
Both pay dividends: Lifetime Brands yields 2.2% and National Presto Industries 0.72%.
National Presto Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 18 for Lifetime Brands), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LCUT | NPK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $179M | $993M |
| Share price | $7.77 | $139.11 |
| Change, 1 year | 139% | 45.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −57.5% | 61.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.98 | 0.64 |
| Employees | 1,080 | 1,200 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 6.0× | – |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 1.7× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 2.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.4× (better) | 13.8× |
| P/FCF | 3.5× (better) | 21.3× |
| FCF yield | 28.4% (better) | 4.7% |
| Fair value | $22.25 | $132.93 |
| Margin of safety | 65.1% (better) | −4.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.2% | 20.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −3.4% | 7.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 48.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 43.7% (better) | 18.7% |
| Operating margin | 7.4% | 12.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.3% | 10.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.6% | 8.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 14.5% (better) | 14.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 23.4% (better) | 14.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.08 | – |
| Interest coverage | 2.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.45 | 4.76 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.89 | 9.29 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.2% (better) | 0.72% |
| Payout ratio | 13.4% | 12.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.2% (better) | 0.72% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 43.4% | 61.4% |
| Held by insiders | 47.8% | 28.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$355K (better) | −$418K |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.2% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- LCUT stock overview
- LCUT income statement
- LCUT valuation and score
- NPK stock overview
- NPK income statement
- NPK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.