StockData

Lineage Cell Therapeutics vs Surrozen

LCTX and SRZN side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How LCTX and SRZN compare

Surrozen is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Lineage Cell Therapeutics ($372M against $231M).

Lineage Cell Therapeutics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.18% versus −8.8% for Surrozen).

Lineage Cell Therapeutics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.2% compared with −2885% at Surrozen.

Lineage Cell Therapeutics scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 5 for Surrozen), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricLCTXSRZN
Size and price
Market cap$231M$372M
Share price$0.915$31.61
Change, 1 year−52.6%144%
Change, 5 years−60.1%−77.1%
Beta (5Y)0.960.52
Employees7744
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)5
Valuation score00
Growth score00
Performance score3 (better)0
Health score55
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S21.3× (better)32.3×
P/B3.4×–
FCF yield−11.4%−9.4% (better)
Fair value$0.620–
Margin of safety−47.6%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)0.18% (better)−8.8%
Revenue growth, 5Y average51.5%–
Profitability
Operating margin−280% (better)−385%
Net margin16.2% (better)−2885%
FCF margin−244% (better)−304%
Return on equity3.9%–
Return on invested capital−1395%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Current ratio5.9612.14 (better)
Altman Z-score−2.87 (better)−6.78
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−0.94%
Shareholder yield0.00% (better)−0.94%
Ownership
Held by institutions46.1%91.3%
Held by insiders74.4%44.5%
Insider net buying, 12 months$24.4K$1.6M (better)
Short interest, % of float37.7%49.6%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.