LCI Industries vs Patrick Industries
LCII and PATK side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LCII and PATK compare
LCI Industries and Patrick Industries are about the same size, with market caps of $2.4B and $2.5B.
On earnings, LCI Industries is cheaper: it trades at 11.5× trailing earnings, against 18.4× for Patrick Industries.
LCI Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.1% versus 3.2% for Patrick Industries).
LCI Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.2% compared with 3.7% at Patrick Industries.
Both pay dividends: LCI Industries yields 4.6% and Patrick Industries 2.4%.
LCI Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (23 against 11 for Patrick Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LCII | PATK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.4B | $2.5B |
| Share price | $98.98 | $77.68 |
| Change, 1 year | 9.5% | −21.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −34.3% | 45.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.24 | 1.12 |
| Employees | 12K | 7,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 23 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.5× (better) | 18.4× |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 0.6× |
| P/B | 1.7× (better) | 2.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.2× (better) | 8.9× |
| P/FCF | 8.4× (better) | 19.5× |
| FCF yield | 11.9% (better) | 5.1% |
| Fair value | $130.66 | $72.63 |
| Margin of safety | 24.2% (better) | −7.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.1% (better) | 3.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.1% | 9.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 38.8% (better) | 16.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 43.6% (better) | 14.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 3.8% | 6.9% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.7% (better) | 23.1% |
| Operating margin | 7.5% (better) | 6.7% |
| Net margin | 5.2% (better) | 3.7% |
| FCF margin | 7.1% (better) | 3.2% |
| Return on equity | 15.0% (better) | 13.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 10.6% (better) | 8.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.60 (better) | 1.25 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.50 (better) | 3.19 |
| Current ratio | 2.49 | 2.67 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.23 (better) | 2.86 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.6% (better) | 2.4% |
| Payout ratio | 52.8% | 40.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 9 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 10.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.6% | 4.3% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 7.2% (better) | 6.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 112% |
| Held by insiders | 3.6% | 4.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$13.1M | −$1.9M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.3% | 19.0% |
Go deeper
- LCII stock overview
- LCII income statement
- LCII valuation and score
- PATK stock overview
- PATK income statement
- PATK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.