Liberty Energy vs SLB
LBRT and SLB side by side, both in oil and gas field services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LBRT and SLB compare
SLB is the larger company, worth 29 times as much as Liberty Energy ($79.8B against $2.8B).
On earnings, Liberty Energy is cheaper: it trades at 22.8× trailing earnings, against 26.0× for SLB.
SLB grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.5% versus 2.3% for Liberty Energy).
SLB keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.5% compared with 2.9% at Liberty Energy.
Both pay dividends: Liberty Energy yields 2.1% and SLB 2.2%.
SLB scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Liberty Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LBRT | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.8B | $79.8B |
| Share price | $16.88 | $53.74 |
| Change, 1 year | −10.9% | 45.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 42.2% | 60.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.96 | 0.73 |
| Employees | 5,800 | 109K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.8× (better) | 26.0× |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 2.2× |
| P/B | 1.4× (better) | 3.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.7× (better) | 12.2× |
| P/FCF | – | 16.6× |
| FCF yield | −11.5% | 6.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $14.35 | $39.80 |
| Margin of safety | −17.6% (better) | −35.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.3% | 2.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 32.9% (better) | 8.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −43.5% | −24.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −43.1% | −29.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 18.5% | – |
| Operating margin | 1.3% | – |
| Net margin | 2.9% | 8.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | −7.5% | 13.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 6.1% | 13.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.66 | 0.43 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.41 | 0.98 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.99 (better) | 1.44 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.19 | 2.95 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.1% | 2.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 47.3% | 54.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 45.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 1.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.1% | 3.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 112% | 92.3% |
| Held by insiders | 4.2% | 0.19% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.7M (better) | −$25.6M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.1% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- LBRT stock overview
- LBRT income statement
- LBRT valuation and score
- SLB stock overview
- SLB income statement
- SLB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.