Li Bang International vs STAK
LBGJ and STAK side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LBGJ and STAK compare
STAK grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.2% versus −31.0% for Li Bang International).
STAK keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.5% compared with −49.8% at Li Bang International.
Li Bang International scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 3 for STAK), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LBGJ | STAK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.93 | $1.54 |
| Change, 1 year | −100.0% | 170% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.05 | – |
| Employees | 134 | 45 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −31.0% | 13.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 19.0% | 26.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | −56.7% | 3.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −49.8% | 1.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | −15.1% | 2.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −11.4% | 2.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.81 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 8.16 |
| Interest coverage | – | 4.5× |
| Current ratio | 0.79 | 1.72 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 2 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.00% | – |
| Held by insiders | 83.6% | 47.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $288K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.5% | 13.0% |
Go deeper
- LBGJ stock overview
- LBGJ income statement
- LBGJ valuation and score
- STAK stock overview
- STAK income statement
- STAK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.